The Call of the Land, As We Teeter Toward the Tipping Point, A Rural Advantage
THE CALL OF THE LAND
As We Teeter Toward The Tipping Point: A Rural Advantage
7/10/2010 6:53:06 PM
by Steven McFadden
http://www.grit.com/call-of-the-land/rural-advantage.aspx
The Sower“I am convinced that sustainability is the
defining question of the 21st Century,” John Ikerd said
one icy afternoon in the depth of February, weeks before
the Gulf of Mexico exploded into an infernal industrial
mess of oil, gas, and chemical dispersant.
Ikerd, a senior statesman among American agrarians, was
addressing a conference hosted by the Nebraska Sustainable
Agriculture Society in Lincoln. He earned a standing
ovation for his definitive, imperative, and impassioned
remarks.
Ikerd painted a convincing word picture of how sustainable
food production systems can and should be employed to
restore health to our bodies and minds, to restore
vitality to the land, and to restore long-term stability
to our economy. This healing potential, he said as he
sounded a conference keynote, is a rural advantage.
America would do well to take note.
The very day Ikerd spoke, Bob Herbert wrote an op-ed
column titled “Time is Running Out” for The New York
Times. “We’ve now lost 8.4 million jobs in this recession,
and a vast majority of them are gone for good,” Herbert
reported. “The politicians are clambering aboard the jobs
bandwagon, belatedly, but very few are telling the truth
about the structural employment problems in the U.S. and
the extremely heavy lift that is necessary to halt our
declining living standards and get us back to an economy
that is self-sustaining.”
Noting that our economy has been thrown desperately out of
whack by frantic, debt-driven consumption, speculative
bubbles, and exotic financial instruments, Herbert
reported that living standards are sinking swiftly in the
USA, and that there is no coherent long-term vision or
plan for reversing that ominous trend.
Almost as if he picked up on the same thought train as the
Times columnist, but basing his response on a lifetime of
work advocating for clean, truly economic agriculture,
Ikerd in his speech said that the issue which has
potential to bring this all into focus is public health –
specifically the growing epidemics of obesity, diabetes,
hypertension, arthritis, allergies and asthma. All these
illnesses are related to diet, and our diet is directly
related to the way we cultivate the land and raise our
animals. It’s all linked.
Now gluttonously congested with agrichemicals, processing
and genetic-mechanical initiatives, that link has led to
some staggeringly expensive consequences. Health care
spending devoured 17 percent of the entire U.S. economy
last year according to the Federal Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid. Just a few years back it was only 5 percent,
6 percent, and then 7 percent. But over the same time
period that our diets and our land have been dosed with
chemicals, hormones, processing and GMOs, our health costs
have ballooned to the present onerous 17 percent. Soon,
according to the projections of the Federal Centers,
health care will be devouring 20 percent, and then 22
percent of our annual economy. That’s money we could be
spending on lots of other things we need.
“For the last 50 years,” Ikerd said, “our focus has been
on producing a lot of cheap stuff – with chemicals,
herbicides and GMOs. But the decline in human health has
paralleled this.” Putting the paradox into a sound bite,
he said, “Our country is now both overfed and
undernourished.”
One day before Ikerd spoke and Herbert wrote his column
for the Times, Congressman Jeff Fortenberry (R), a member
of the House Agriculture Committee, told the Nebraska
conference that consumers who buy directly from food
producers keep 90 percent of food income in the
agricultural sector, supporting their neighbors who are
local, sustainable growers. Fortenberry also made the
connection between clean, healthy food and the kind of
good health that could dramatically shrink health-care
costs.
John Ikerd, Ph.D.John Ikerd really drove the point home
with his facts and his rhetoric. The tipping point will
come, he said, when we realize that the economic and
environmental health of the nation depends upon, and is
directly related to the physical and mental health of the
people, and that that is related to the health of the soil
and the way we cultivate the land.
As with other American agrarians, Ikerd sees the potential
of clean sustainable agriculture to be the vision and the
plan that leads us out of recession and pollution and into
the future with clean food, healthy bodies and minds, a
vibrant environment, and a stable economy built on
something real and enduring.
“The tide is changing,” he said at the end of his talk.
“It takes healthy people to maintain healthy soil and to
bring healthy food from the land. There is a new purpose
for people to be out in rural areas now, to repopulate our
farmlands and to create healthy soil, and healthy food
that will lead to healthy people. We need to rebuild from
the soil up, and we can do it. Where are we going to find
the jobs of the future? They are on the land. There’s a
whole new concept of society emerging that is based on
local, clean healthy food. That’s the rural advantage.”
N.B. - John Ikerd published a new book online in April: A
Revolution of the Middle
Comments
*
Steven McFadden 7/13/2010 1:08:08 PM
Hi Mountain Woman -
Thanks for your comments. By all means, the answer
is not just transplanting city folk to the country for all
the reasons you enumerate, although out here in the
Heartland of Nebraska and other states, our villages have
been depopulated over the last 20-30 years, and could
definitely use an influx of people who know how to live on
the land, or are at least open to learning. Like Ikerd, I
feel that will happen for a host of economic and
environmental reasons, some harsh, and that eventually the
industrial models of 'working the land' will give way to
enlightened agrarian ways of 'living with' the land.
Thankfully, the move toward Urban and Suburban
Agrarianism is well under way -- and I was happy to be
able to present dozens of models of what is happening in
my book, The Call of the Land. But more and more models
and innovations keep coming forward, even since the book
was published less than a year ago. Great hope in this.
*
MountainWoman 7/13/2010 12:56:18 PM
Interesting article. There is a definite interest in
Vermont in eating locally produced food and agritourism
has become very popular but with that popularity comes
skyrocketing food prices and I'm glad we produce our own.
I do worry though about romanticizing farm land and
perhaps causing an exodus to the country of people who
really belong in the city. When land is lost to sprawl or
even small acreage plots, it's gone forever and so many
people who move to the country demand the services they
had before. It's always a struggle in Vermont where we
fight to keep our land free from development. We need to
revitalize our cities with roof top gardens, community
gardens and other methods of keeping our cities vital,
healthy population centers and we need to discourage
sprawl to precious farmland. Nothing irritates me more
than seeing a mega-mansion plunked down in the middle of
once beautiful, fertile soil.
How do you encourage people to live lives based on
less consumption when they are bombarded with images of
excess every day?
And how will we feed an ever expanding population
without the massive farming we have now? This is a topic
of great interest to me and it would be most enlightening
to perhaps have a round table discussion on the challenges
facing us as we move forward.
*
K.C. Compton 7/12/2010 11:01:49 PM
Steven, thank you for this excellent post. I started
reading it and thought, "Hey, this guy's a reporter!" Good
to know my instincts still serve me.
I wish I had already gotten set up on the farm my
kids and I dream of owning together, however. I worry that
the point will tip too soon, too soon.
Dave--I hear you're going to come see us soon.
Looking forward to that. And the point you make about
America being a nation of city dwellers is correct--
however the "urban farm"phenomenon is changing the
equation. I fully see cities in the future in which food
is so local you just go up to your roof top pick dinner
from the vine and harvest a few eggs for the evening
omelet. When our nation began, cows, sheep and chickens
certainly occupied our urban landscape (I wonder if Mrs.
O'Leary's cow messed it up for urban livestock for a
century or so?) and I think the next 50 years will see
them become a part of city life again. Won't THAT be cool?
--K.C.
*
Chuck 7/12/2010 10:07:30 PM
@Steven, thank you for your good writing and
shedding light on this. Ironic how America was primarily a
farming country and now there are so few family farms,
only heavy corn and soybean production by large commercial
farms.
No big employment problems then, in the old days. I
guess I dream we will at least return to a country filled
with local organic farms and lots of people working them-
-and people eating local.
*
Steven McFadden 7/12/2010 4:15:00 PM
Hi Dave -
I live in the shadow of the Sower, and can see him
up there scattering his seed even as I sit and type. A
falcon family has taken to nesting a ways down below his
feet, so he's got company up there atop the capital
building.
In the blog post above I am mainly reporting what
others have said -- John Ikerd, Bob Herbert and on --
rather than writing my own views. I've was a news reporter
for a long time, so that's a habit hard to break. But
ultimately I do agree with the notion that Ikerd put forth
that as things wobble and collapse -- as they are -- there
is an advantage to the rural life. The sophisticated,
sustainable, agrarian or rural life is in fact -- as
personified by the kind of people who read Grit and
implement the ideas -- the hope of the present and the
future. That's my view. That's why -- like you and the
other Grit bloggers -- these are the things I am
interested in and choose to write about.
The industrial mess in the Gulf of Mexico is, alas,
driving the point home relentlessly just now. Folks are
lucky that there is Grit and other places like to turn to
for clues and guidance about the way forward.
Thank you for your comments. You have so many
worthwhile insights to share. - S.
*
Nebraska Dave 7/12/2010 3:56:58 PM
@Steven, by the way I love the picture of seed
sower. I visit the Capitol Building quite frequently. For
those readers that are not aware, the seed sower is a
statue on top of the dome of our State Capitol (Nebraska)
building.
*
Nebraska Dave 7/12/2010 3:53:11 PM
@Steven, I agree with all you have said but
unfortunately America has become a city dwelling consumer
nation. I wish that our thirst for more would turn around
but I don’t think it will until it hits us in the pocket
book. It seems to me people have excepted the higher gas
prices and are driving just as frivolously as before they
thought it was a tragedy the price of a gallon went above
a dollar. I’ve been to many Central American countries and
seriously we still do have relatively cheap gas here
compared to their prices. Our country is so extravagant in
the way we live. We will spend more on a fast food dinner
for the family here than a Central American family will
for an entire week. Understand I love this country and
thoroughly enjoy its conveniences. As I’ve stated in other
replies before, I sure like the hot showers and the flush
toilets, and I hope you are correct in stating that the
consuming trend is changing or we will have to learn all
over again how to survive and not enjoy the good life we
have now. I understand about the unemployment but other
countries have unemployment rates that are three and four
times higher than ours. I’m not saying that we should just
be grateful for how things and not be concerned about
what’s happening. This country is still the best in my
humble opinion. I believe there are a lot of things we
could do to make this country even better and getting back
to our grass roots heritage living certainly is one of
them.



